Another dot in the blogosphere?

Posts Tagged ‘smartphone

Anyone who says X must be placed before technology needs to carefully consider whether this is always the case. In education, X is often pedagogy.

I have explained before why this dichotomous, cart-and-horse thinking is outdated. So to provoke refection, I share another example, this one closer to our hearts.

I am referring to our smartphones and how these wonders of technology change the way we talk and walk.
 

 
They change us so much that in 2014, the city of Chongqing, China, created pavements for smombie (smartphone zombie) pedestrians.

The same paper reported how Ausberg, Germany, is experimenting with traffic lights embedded in pavements for pedestrians who do not look up.

The casual reader might comment that these smartphone users are not being very smart. This does nothing to deflect the fact that such Darwin award-winning behaviours are increasingly common.

While local governments and schools will probably be involved in multi-pronged efforts to dissuade smombie walking, the fact remains that mobile phones have already shaped behaviours. The “technology effect” preceded other actions and reactions.

It is important to recognise that this happens and question what might become dogma like pedagogy-before-technology.

I am not saying that pedagogy is not important. I make a living off promoting progressive pedagogy in my workshops and seminars. I am saying that we should question our assumptions and work within different contexts.

To ignore that is to be dogmatic. That is just like being fixated on a mobile device while crossing the road instead of paying attention to environment.

Greenbot led with an article about the fifteen things we seem to have forgotten to do because we now have smartphones.

How about fifteen things we can do or do better? I contrast their cannots with the cans in my own series on how they affect teaching or learning.
 
1. Cannot make phone calls. Can communicate in many other ways.

Successful N800 video call by rnair, on Flickr
Creative Commons Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic License   by  rnair 

 
When is a phone no longer a phone? When it is too smart to be just a phone. It is a messenger, updater, tweeter, emailer, orderer, reminder-er, etc. Messages may be shorter, but they can be so much more efficient and no less meaningful.

And when you need to hear someone’s voice, you still can. Better still, you can see their faces too.

Instead of insisting there is just one way to communicate, teachers should take the smartphone cue and learn the other ways their learners have already adopted.
 
 
2. Cannot remember phone numbers. Prioritize your brain for better things.

 
Memorization might be one basis for learning, but it is not the only way.

Memorization is a case for just-in-case learning of stable information. We used to remember phone numbers in case we needed them for use later. Dumbed down memorization, rote, is one extreme path that many still take thinking that it leads to academic success.

Memorization does not prepare you for just-in-time and situational learning of volatile information. A smartphone, wearable device, or something similar can be used to collect, record, or process data, or provide performance support. The devices help us deal with more important things instead of fussing over trivial ones.

Educators might refer to important things such as higher order thinking skills (HOTS). Memorization has not gone away; it has simply been outsourced to the phone.
 
 
3. Cannot read a map. You can interact with one.

Toward Lonsdale Street satellite view - by avlxyz, on Flickr
Creative Commons Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic License   by  avlxyz 

 
Maps attempt to put a three-dimensional space (actual world) into a two-dimensional one (flat world). Both paper and electronic maps suffer from this and place an unnecessary cognitive load on the user.

However, tools like Google Maps offer street views which are attempts to recreate the real world as seen by human eyes. Smartphone maps allow users to overlay useful information like traffic, restaurants, points of interest, etc. Tapping on these overlays might reveal more information in the form of user-provided photos or reviews.

Traditional maps are important to the cartographer. Smartphone maps are important to you.

Old maps, like schooling, are one-size-fits-all. Electronic maps, like education, serve the individual.
 
 
4. Cannot balance a checkbook (cheque book). You can learn to be financially literate.

The article is US-centric, hence the spelling and the antiquated reference. I have a cheque book that is about a decade old and looks as good as new.

Balancing your finances is as much a mindset as it is a skill. Neither bundled pieces of paper nor apps alone are going to make you fiscally responsible. That said, smartphones with the right apps allow users to keep track of finances, set up expenditure alerts, and manage funds quickly and safely. Paired with financial literacy programmes, these apps are powerful ways to teach self-management.
 
 
5 & 6. No need to write in cursive/Write legibly. You can write in other ways.

 
The premise is wrong. How many people actually wrote legibly in the days before the smartphone?

Schools, for the large part, still insist kids learn how to use pens and pencils over typing, so the writing persists.

I say this as one who was schooled with fountain pens and enjoyed the art of manuscript writing. If there is a need for writing, it might only to be to pen one’s signature. But advancements in biometrics should remove that some day.

When kids leave the schooling system (or when they step out of it each school day), they enter worlds where they can type, audio record, video record, draw, animate, and so on. These are so much more complex and richer than just writing.
 
 
7. No need to take good pictures because of Instagram filters. You can do and learn much more.

Video recording by Onefound, on Flickr
Creative Commons Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic License   by  Onefound 

 
With smartphone photos, you can backup, tag, edit, share, comment, and tell a compelling story. You can get feedback, and if you heed it, then take better photos. You can do all these in a fraction of the time it took with film.

Doing all these requires an open and sharing mindset. There is nothing like doing to ingrain this system.

But I draw the line with obsessive selfie-taking if it becomes less about sharing and more about narcissism.
 
 
8. Cannot set an alarm clock. Yes, you can… and more.

 
You can still set not just one, but multiple alarms on your smartphone. You can let the the smartphone set the right time, keep track of time zones, or serve as a stopwatch, countdown/up timer.

Integrated into apps, smartphone clocks remind us to look up from our screens, stand up from our work desks, and cue any event in life. Paired with behavior modification, these can nurture better life habits.
 
 
9. Cannot do basic arithmetic. Why would you want to?
See point 2.
 
 
10. Cannot wait in line. Wait, you mean we can better wait in line.

Texting Congress 3 by afagen, on Flickr
Creative Commons Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic License   by  afagen 

 
We can while our time away by reading, gaming, chatting, listening to music, watching videos, working, ad nauseum. These do not replace full blown instances of entertainment or education, but they make use of what I like to call interstitial learning time [1] [2].
 
 
11. Cannot just use the toilet. You can do more business than you expect.

41/52 - Some Alone Time by KJGarbutt, on Flickr
Creative Commons Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License   by  KJGarbutt 

 
Seated relatively comfortably, you can extend your interstitial time (see point 10).
 
 
12. Cannot just read a book. You can read several.

 
You can carry hundreds of books in a device no heavier than just one book. You can have a book read to you. You can interact with media elements, learn to read non-linearly, and develop literacies beyond just text.
 
 
13. Cannot just turn on lights. You can have greater control.

 
You can monitor your home and access your computer remotely. You can schedule electricals to be switched on or off on schedule. You can be there without being there.

You can also be there without being there with online resources, mobile-friendly MOOCs, and video conferencing.
 
 
14. Cannot be productive. Yes, you can.

media stacking by Will Lion, on Flickr
Creative Commons Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic License   by  Will Lion 

 
The device that many like to call distracting is simultaneously an enabler. You can install apps that are time and/or location aware to limit use when not appropriate.

Distractions are not problems. They are opportunities to develop discipline and self-management.
 
 
15. Cannot stand up straight.

 
It is hard to argue against this one. Fear-mongerers like to mention problems with eyesight, ignoring people in social situations, and other ills. How about the danger of not looking where you are going or driving?
 
 
So where does this leave us?

The original article suggested fifteen things we no longer seem to be able to do thanks to the adoption of smartphones. Perhaps some of these things we should no longer be doing because they are no longer relevant or because they hold us back.

I shake my head in disbelief sometimes when I think about how inflexible some schools or teachers can be.

I know of some schools who have more liberal mobile device policies. As part of a consulting gig, I visited a primary school whose policy was to allow all students, even the youngest ones, to bring smartphones to school as long as the devices were kept in lockers.

Other schools have Amish-like policies on smartphones. I am very familiar with one that disallows cassettes, CD players, walkmans, VCDs, and pagers amongst other devices (see portion of handbook below).

handbook_rule

Even the Amish might remark that they do not use these devices not because they are against them but because they might have to rob a museum to get them!

The first type of school is more progressive in that it recognizes the modern demands of their stakeholders. Both parents are likely to be working and their child might have to find their own way home on arranged or public transport. Phones are critical for such daily updates.

That same school does not yet allow the use of the phones for lessons. However, they will have will not have to fight the battles of resistance among teachers, low buy-in among parents, or early “exploratory” use among students when the time comes for them to make that decision.

The second school will have a tougher time pulling itself out of the educational dark ages.

A rigid, backward, or disconnected policy also has a way of affecting the mindset of teachers. It can breed group think, inflexibility, and a fear of risk-taking.

My wife reminded me of something we experienced in the middle of the year. My son had answered a comprehension question on a passage about Elizabeth Choy being tortured during the Japanese Occupation of Singapore [1][2].

The correct answer to a question was that she was given “electric shocks”. My son did not get the full marks because he answered that she had been “electrocuted”. His teacher did not give him the full marks because he did not write down exactly what was in the passage.

This incensed my wife, an English teacher, who discussed it with my son’s teacher. My wife also asked her colleagues in school for their comments. Everyone except my son’s teacher agreed that getting an electric shock was the same as being electrocuted.

To be fair, there could have been more to the argument. Perhaps there was some comprehension skill that was tested that my son did not perform.

But perhaps the equivalent of copying and pasting was more important than interpretation and exercising vocabulary. Perhaps schooling was more important than education.

And perhaps these are examples of how teachers and schools risk losing relevance. The rest of the world sees the point of change and moves on, but teachers and schools do not.

Recently I read a CNET article, The changing face of mobile photography. As I read the article, I also saw lessons on the design of mobile learning.

The article described how taking photos with a smartphone has evolved from quirky habit to mainstream behavior. Such social and professional acceptance has been partly due to better technology and evolving mindsets.

In the early days of the smartphone, few people had them and the built-in cameras were terrible. Fast forward to today and more people have smartphones whose cameras rival point-and-shoots and even prosumers. Pro photographers can rely on smartphones as second cameras and lay folk can use them as main cameras.

But there are deeper reasons why people prefer smartphones. Che McPherson, design content lead at iStockphoto, says:

You’re getting real, authentic moments using a smartphone, because they are so unobtrusive and accessible.

I wonder if we can say the same about mobile learning. Unobtrusive and accessible. Learning that seems natural and is easy to get to when you need it.

In the competitive field of stock photography, plenty of international brands are seeking images that look and feel authentic. “Nowadays, people are engaging with emotion — a raw, authentic moment,” McPherson said. Apple is just one example of a company that has made the explicit connection between memories, emotion and mobile photography


Video source

Is our mobile learning making connections between what we remember, what we experience, and what we feel? If not, we can create mobile apps or courses but learners will not relate to them.

The expectations of what is acceptable have also changed. Purists believe that photos should not be manipulated. Instagram changed that with filters.

The popularity of Instagram filters or presets like VSCo make us react to photos in different ways, whether that’s evoking a sense of nostalgia or intensifying emotion and a sense of urgency through black-and-white processing.

McPherson is seeing a trend of stock photographers submitting filtered images that have been processed in such a way as to deliberately elicit an emotional reaction in the viewer.

Again, are we leveraging enough on emotions like awe, happiness, and excitement in mobile course design? Or are we still stuck with fear, anxiety, or exasperation with the tests we put at the end of courses?

We chuckle when we see someone using a slate device to take photographs. But the article points out how photos are easier to view and manipulate on such devices.

As we design for mobile learning, do we embrace a diversity of views and methods? Or do we pick topics and strategies that require fixed outcomes or answers?

…we hardly use them as phones?

…the phones are actually mobile, multifunction devices?

…the devices are not smart in themselves?

…what makes you smart is how you use them?

…most schools have such dumb policies about their use?

Don’t believe me? Watch a kid. Ask a kid.

Those could be the smartest things you do as an educator.


http://edublogawards.com/files/2012/11/finalistlifetime-1lds82x.png
http://edublogawards.com/2010awards/best-elearning-corporate-education-edublog-2010/

Click to see all the nominees!

QR code


Get a mobile QR code app to figure out what this means!

My tweets

Archives

Usage policy

%d bloggers like this: