Another dot in the blogosphere?

Posts Tagged ‘permission

When I enter contract negotiations for my talks, workshops, or consulting services, I occasionally see this line item: Video recording the session.

When I ask what this is for, the usual responses include archiving, showcasing, reference for absentees, or later review. I object to all three, but not for the reasons you might expect.
 

 
Archiving or showcasing a session on video is a lot of work with very little return on investment. If you want to do a good job of archiving or showcasing, the video must spend a lot of time in post-production. At the bare minimum, every minute shot needs at least ten in editing.

If the video is meant to be a reference, I wonder:

  • Who exactly is going to watch the video?
  • Why do they need to do this?
  • How exactly is watching a video a proxy for attendance?
  • What use is a video-based review if it is incidental and not designed for follow-up?

A workshop is about work, not watching dispassionately. Even though my sessions are blended, they designed for being there, getting involved, and learning together. A video is not the same as being there.

A workshop is also about context. I have conducted many sessions with the same title, but I have to do something different each time because the context changes. The people who attend make a difference to what I do. Watching a video does not give you a sense of context nor the ability to add to it.

Other than these design factors, I also have a consulting factor for saying no to most recordings. A single video recording is a potential loss of opportunity for me. Someone can offer the video in an online repository and an administrator can claim that they have the same experience for free. They do not, and they fool themselves if they think they do.


So I say no to most video recordings while negotiating contracts, when I am asked on the spot, or when I notice video camera pointed at me without permission. This is not about being camera-shy; it is about being savvy with learning design and firm with my rights.

I used to conclude two courses I taught at NIE with this: Change is not about asking for permission first. It is about asking for forgiveness later.

Change is not about asking for permission first. It is about asking for forgiveness later.

I shared this at a panel after my keynote, and before I could elaborate, the moderator reminded the audience that they should not be doing this with budgets or financial transactions. Taken out of the context, it might have seemed like I was advising people break the law. I was not.

The context of my courses was taking ownership of problems in schooling and teaching. The content of my talk was about changing mindsets on how to learn in the workplace. I was advising participants and my audience to be change agents instead of waiting for change to happen.

It might be difficult to visualise this or see the impact of such actions. Thankfully, there is a YouTube video that illustrates this nicely.


Video source

An activist wanted to send Twitter-Germany a message about dealing with hate messages. As he kept getting stonewalled, he decided to take action.

He made stencils out of 30 terrible tweets and sprayed the messages in chalk outside Twitter’s office in Hamburg. The semi-permanence of the chalked text was more impactful visually than scrolling pixels on a screen. They were tough to ignore.

The video ended with Twitter doing in real life what it seemed to be doing online. It removed what was immediately outside its building on the pavement, but left intact the majority of messages slightly further away.

I do not know if there was a longer term impact of the activist’s actions, but his message spread on Twitter, RSS feeds, and news sites.

He did not wait for permission to take action because he saw a real and urgent need to do something. If he got into the good sort of trouble, he could ask for forgiveness later.

The lesson is this: It is not about guaranteeing a change as a result of action; it is about taking action when few, if any, are ready or prepared. It is about moving in the right direction even though the destination is not clear.

It is about not asking for permission to move, and if you make reasonable mistakes, asking for forgiveness later.

Singapore’s mrbrown shared his snapshot of a presentation.

The statement — we cannot allow regulation to catch up with innovation — is not restricted to business or change management. It extends to education as well, but this is not the mindset of most teachers or leaders in this field.

People involved in schooling were themselves schooled to be compliant and are self-selecting because they tend to be cooperative and nurturing. They toe the line and do not question policies and practices even though they might stifle innovation.

So how do schools innovate? They need to let in people who have this mindset: Change is not about asking for permission first. It is about asking for forgiveness later.

Change is not about asking for permission first. It is about asking for forgiveness later.

Innovation in schooling is almost an oxymoron. It does happen, but very slowly. The catalysts are mavericks and trouble-makers who have good intent.

There is more than one way to innovate. The fastest is not to ask for permission first.

This is one of my favourite sayings. I modified it from my assorted readings (and watchings and listenings) about leadership. I cannot find a definitive source for this quote.

The quote resonates with me because it reflects my belief system. It is a key driving force for why and how I do things.

It should come as no surprise by now that my graphic has all the hallmarks of Haiku Deck.

With a basic account, export options are limited. After I am satisfied with the look of the graphic, I take a screenshot of it on my iPad and upload it to Google Photos. I put the image in an album with other quotes and copy the URL to the image. The final step is embedding and resizing the image here.

I found the original image using the keyword “forgiveness”.
 

 
However, in the several weeks of doing this “quotable quotes” series, I have found that Haiku Deck‘s method of finding photos differs markedly from ImageCodr‘s. It can take a fair bit of investigative work to trace the source of images.

On 3 Sep 2008, Digital Life (subscription required) featured a colourful graphic* on pp. 14-15 to illustrate a white paper by Dr Tracey Wilen-Daugenti of Cisco Systems.

The original white paper by Wilen-Daugenti can be downloaded here (PDF). The parts of the white paper I found particularly interesting were on pages 5-9. (Never mind that the student featured had the same name as me!) The content in those pages featured Web 2.0 as key to 21st century learning.

So just what is 21st century learning? We will be exploring that nebulous concept in weeks to come.

*I sought the permission of the newspaper publisher to use the graphic. I am including the email I sent to the publisher and their reply to me (permission-to-use-article-for-teacher-education). I am hoping that my action might serve as one model for teachers on how to use resources in a responsible way.


http://edublogawards.com/files/2012/11/finalistlifetime-1lds82x.png
http://edublogawards.com/2010awards/best-elearning-corporate-education-edublog-2010/

Click to see all the nominees!

QR code


Get a mobile QR code app to figure out what this means!

Archives

Usage policy

%d bloggers like this: