Posts Tagged ‘analysis’
Last month I pondered on how I could use a YouTube video on Trump’s tweets to teach discourse analysis.
Earlier this week I chanced upon a video that might be used to illustrate how to report discourse analysis.
By relying on the expertise of a debate master, the creators of this video outlined how Kellyanne Conway deals with questions that get thrown her way and how she frustrates journalists.
Her strategies were to:
- Deflect by repeating keywords and going off on a tangent.
- Take advantage of the politeness of interviewers and their need to move on to other questions.
- Pass the buck when she did not have answers.
- Fabricate information.
These strategies were a result of basic analysis: Listening and watching videos of Conway, noting patterns, chunking patterns, and verifying patterns. That is a simplified version of a how-to of video content analysis.
What is valuable in this video is how the evidence was presented. The pattern was textbook: Present each main strategy, illustrate it once, illustrate it again, and explain it concisely to remove doubt.
As much as I would rather not have videos of Trump or Conway as fodder for learning these skills, they are a reminder that good things can emerge from bad if we know how to look. The content itself is emotionally charged and this can be leveraged on to create memorable lessons and to show novices how to be objective when it matters.
I never thought I would ever type this: There are valuable lessons in Trump’s tweets.
I am not referring to learning how NOT to be inflammatory. I am thinking about how his tweets are good for discourse analysis. I am doing this thanks to this insightful video by Nerdwriter1.
The video creator did a great job of chunking Trump’s tweets by type and nuance in numbers, and analysing their design and impact.
I might use this video as a resource if I get a chance to work with a group of teachers who need to learn how to do discourse analysis for the purpose of narrative-style reporting and research writing.
If I do, this will show how one might learn from something negative.
The Onion, the news satire website, is always good for a laugh, that is, provided you know that it’s poking fun at real life events or people!
One of their latest “news reports” was a stab at Justin Bieber (gag!).
But not everyone realized that it was satire. Here is a snapshot of group of local students and a teacher having a Facebook conversation about it (click to see larger version). I have blocked out the names and faces to protect their identities. (Bieber, on the other hand, needs no protection. Quite the opposite, really.)
It’s enough to make you cry. I’m not referring to The Onion, but to the use of English and the digital ignorance.
I won’t say much about the teaching and learning of English because that is the domain of English teachers. I will say that what I have captured is quite typical and yet still decipherable. (It is almost impossible to read the tweeny and teeny tweets that come my way accidentally because my handle is @ashley.)
What worries me is that the analysis and evaluation of digital resources does not seem to feature prominently in our schools. It is not taught or modelled in any significant way. You don’t need a special course or teacher to do this. It should be done in every academic subject by every teacher!
Yes, what I have captured is a snapshot. But any teacher who takes advantage of social media experiences this every day, perhaps several times a day. Put all these snapshots together and you see the bigger picture.
We need to teach our learners how to peel onions (or Onions) apart, layer by layer, to figure out if they are edible (have any worth). The process won’t be pleasant, but they must do this because they already live, study and work in the digital world.