Going deep enough
Posted January 19, 2017on:
Could there possibly be a lesson on teaching from the way Trump tweets?
There could, if you looked hard and reflectively enough.
I read a short article by TODAY, Donald Trump praises wrong Ivanka in Twitter shout-out, and was dissatisfied. I wanted to see the tweet embedded in the article itself, not just quoted as text. This would attribute and show the source.
But attributing and showing sources is not the lesson for teachers, important as those practices are.
I decided to look for another article and found one by The Guardian, Donald Trump mistakes Ivanka from Brighton for his daughter. This article not only provided the tweet source, it did so in entirety, including the graphic embedded in the tweet. The graphic put the point in the exclamation.
Teachers often have to make judgement calls in the race to complete curricula. One of the questions is: How much can I cover?
To answer this question with “as much and as quickly as possible”, the response is often to resort to favouring breadth over depth.
The TODAY article covered the story as did The Guardian. Even a superficial examination of both would reveal how much deeper the latter was. There was more information, background, and embedded content.
The Guardian article took more work, provided more information, and I would argue, educated its readers more the TODAY’s syndicated article.
It is up to us to decide not just what is better, but also what is right. There may be times when depth being sacrificed for breadth is justified, e.g., the topic is introductory.
However, if we are to nurture critical and reflective thinkers, our learners must be given the space and resources to do this. This happens only when we go deep enough in both the teaching and learning activities.
Bonus lesson: Trump made the mistake only because he replied to a tweet with the wrong Ivanka handle. If he paused to check, he would not have made that embarrassing mistake.