Driven by fear, common sense, or expert opinion? (Part 1)
Posted July 1, 2015on:
I wonder how much glee STonline had when it sponsored a forum and then ran with the headline Curb use of IT devices by the young, say childhood experts.
The title and writeup [archive] conveniently left out what the two experts they featured seemed to be focusing on in shaping early childhood cognition: The importance of play and a rich language environment. This does not mean that one should exclude technology-based play or interaction.
The first expert, Dr Stuart Brown, founder of the National Institute of Play, briefly mentioned a range of play in his interview: object, body, social, imaginative, and narrative. The last time I checked, well designed and managed technology enhances and enables all those.
The second expert, Dana Suskin, while cautioning against complete reliance on technology for language development, added that “Skype or FaceTime, or similar response-based interactive style communication tools, do help” [quote from video].
Brown and Suskin were the experts because they probably have the research to back up what they say. But when explained plainly to laypersons, it sounds like common sense to let kids play and to develop language humanistically.
If common sense was that common, why pay good money to fly in experts and run an event to validate or reinforce what you claim you already know?
If we had that collective common sense, why are some parents foolish enough to let mobiles replace person-to-person interaction? They deserve what is coming to them if they do. Like one parent with a seven-year-old reportedly said: “My older son sometimes refuses to feed himself and asks that I feed him while he uses the iPad” [quote from article].
It also seems like the article and video editor did not work in sync.
The article was decidedly anti-technology and old-school. On the other hand, a soundbite from Dr Brown in the embedded video indicated that “parents should let children decide how to play” [quote from video]. Parts of the video were decidedly progressive.
Perhaps STonline was submitting a weird General Paper essay where cons were delivered in text and pros in video. Maybe, but not likely. Folks who read the dead tree version of ST or choose not to watch the video will not see the other side of the story.
For me, the article reeks of maintaining the status quo by repurposing progressive expert opinion and research.
One of Dr Brown’s slides on screen (citing Einstein) stated “The measure of intelligence is the ability to change”.
- How intelligent are we when it comes to rolling with change?
- How much longer are we going to let headlines with “curb use of devices” hold us back?
- When will we develop enough scientific literacy to find and evaluate such studies so that we make up our own minds?